Let me tell the story as it was likely intended to be told, in the grand tradition of colonial fairy tales.
Once upon a time, a benevolent King from a land of snow and castles journeyed far, far away, deep into the heart of Africa. He came to visit the tribal chiefs of a simple people, a people his ancestors had once wisely ruled. And the King, like a great father returning to his children, brought with him a marvelous gift: a sacred mask, an old fetish his kingdom had kept safe from harm for a hundred years. A great ceremony was held; the natives danced in their raffia skirts to the beat of the tam-tam, and storytellers with cameras gathered to capture the happy scene for all the world to see: the white king, bestowing his grace upon the grateful savages.
This, of course, is a fiction. But it is the potent, self-serving fiction that was projected to the world. It is the bedtime story the Belgian monarchy can now tell its grandchildren, a comforting fable about its own magnanimity. Watching the news, one cannot escape the feeling that what was broadcast as a fairy tale was, in truth, a modern humiliation ceremony.
The Generous Thief
The King’s actual words gave the game away: “I am here to return to you this exceptional work in order to allow Congolese to discover and admire it.” Allow. Discover. As if the Congolese had simply forgotten about their own sacred objects. Like car keys misplaced between couch cushions. Until the Belgian monarch graciously reminded them where to look.
But here’s the punchline that turns this fairy tale into farce: the mask wasn’t even returned. It was loaned. Indefinitely, yes, but loaned nonetheless. The paperwork still says Property of Belgium. Imagine breaking into someone’s house. Stealing their grandmother’s wedding ring. Then decades later magnanimously allowing them to wear it. On the condition that you still own it. This is what passes for justice in the great museums of Europe.
The ceremony in Kinshasa was theater, and everyone knew their lines. The King played the benevolent patriarch. The President played the grateful recipient. The mask played itself. A silent prop forced to witness its own humiliation. If sacred objects could weep, this mask would have cried. Not tears of joy at coming home. But tears of rage at arriving as property, at being “loaned” to its own people. Meanwhile, back in Brussels, tens of thousands of other Congolese artifacts sit in storage. Waiting for their own starring role in some future diplomatic performance.
Crime Scenes with Gift Shops
Step into any prestigious European museum and you’re walking through the world’s most respectable crime scene. The silence isn’t reverence; it’s the quiet after the violence. Each mask behind glass once witnessed a “punitive expedition”: a euphemism for massacre. Each bronze sculpture was melted from objects that missionaries deemed too dangerous for African souls. Each manuscript was “collected” by administrators who took what they wanted and called it anthropology.
The museums have gotten very good at laundering this history. They’ve replaced “stolen” with “acquired,” “looted” with “collected,” and “pillaged” with “preserved.” The wall texts speak of provenance with the passive voice: objects that “came to be” in European collections. As if they walked there themselves, perhaps taking a gap year to see the world before settling down in a nice climate-controlled gallery.
What you won’t find on those pristine labels is the blood. The punitive expedition that brought the Benin Bronzes to London? It burned the royal palace to the ground. The Belgian administrators who “collected” Congolese art? They were enforcing a rubber quota system that killed millions. But none of this makes it onto the little plaques. Instead, we get dates and materials and artistic techniques, everything except the truth: this beauty was built on brutality.
The Holy Trinity of Colonial Excuses
The museums know this, of course. That’s why they’ve developed such elaborate excuses, a holy trinity of colonial cope.
First comes the stewardship argument: Africa can’t possibly care for its own heritage. We’re keeping these treasures safe, they insist, from the chaos and incompetence of their homelands. Never mind that the British Museum recently lost thousands of items to an inside job. Apparently sticky fingers are only a problem south of the Mediterranean. Never mind that European museums regularly suffer from budget cuts, floods, fires, and their own incompetence. When a European museum’s roof leaks, it’s an unfortunate incident. When an African museum faces challenges, it’s proof of inherent inability.
Then there’s the “universal heritage” claim, where African art belongs to all humanity. Curious how this universality only flows northward. You’ll find Benin Bronzes in London but good luck finding the Crown Jewels on permanent display in Lagos. The Rosetta Stone serves all mankind from its perch in the British Museum, but somehow the Mona Lisa’s universal value doesn’t require her to vacation in Cairo. The universe, it seems, has a very specific postal code, and it’s usually in a European capital.
The third excuse is the most audacious: it was all perfectly legal. The theft followed the law. Laws written by the thieves, enforced by the thieves, in courts run by the thieves. It’s like a bank robber acquitting himself because he wrote “This is mine now” on a napkin during the heist. Colonial authorities gave themselves permission to take whatever they wanted, and now their descendants wave these permissions as if they were handed down from Mount Sinai.
A Tale of Two Thefts
What makes this especially galling is that Europe knows exactly how to do restitution when it wants to. When it comes to art stolen by the Nazis, there’s an entire international framework with principles, committees, and special legislation. Britain even passed a law specifically for Nazi-looted art: show a family photo with the painting in the background, and you get it back. No feasibility studies. No committees to form committees. Just a panel, a minister’s signature, and justice done.
But for colonial loot? Suddenly everyone’s hands are tied by the very laws they wrote themselves. “We would love to return your sacred objects,” they sigh, “but Article Such-and-Such of the Museum Act of Whenever simply won’t allow it.” As if laws descended from heaven on stone tablets rather than being scribbled by men in wigs who thought phrenology was cutting-edge science.
A painting stolen from a Jewish family in Vienna? Returned immediately. No questions asked. A mask stolen during a Congolese massacre? That’s complicated. Egyptian treasures looted by archaeologists? We need committees. Chinese bronzes pillaged from the Summer Palace? We need frameworks. Sacred Hindu idols smuggled from temples? We need feasibility studies of feasibility studies. The Rosetta Stone? The Parthenon Marbles? Nefertiti’s bust? All require decades of discussion about the complex nature of cultural heritage.
One family photo gets you Nazi-looted art back. Meanwhile, entire nations with centuries of documented history are told their claims need further review.
The German Plot Twist
The Germans, to their credit, recently showed what’s possible when you drop the theatre. They simply signed over the ownership of the Benin Bronzes to Nigeria. Just like that. Changed the paperwork, transferred the deed. Some pieces are still physically in Berlin, but now they’re there because Nigeria allows it, not because Germany insists on it. The colonizer finally became the borrower.
It wasn’t complicated. It didn’t require decades of study. They just did it. They acknowledged that the objects weren’t theirs, never had been, and acted accordingly. It’s almost like justice is possible when you’re not too busy performing it. This simple act exposed every other excuse for what it is: a choice. Every museum director wringing their hands about legal impossibilities. Every culture minister lamenting the complexity of restitution. Every colonial apologist defending the universal museum. They’re all choosing to maintain the status quo.
The Germans proved that the only real barrier to restitution is the will to do it. Perhaps they learned something from decades of returning Nazi-looted art. Once you’ve admitted to one historic crime, the second confession gets easier. Once you’ve changed the paperwork for one theft, you realize the paperwork was never the problem. Britain and France, meanwhile, seem to have learned the opposite lesson. They’ll return what the Nazis stole but not what they stole themselves. As if there’s a statute of limitations on guilt. As if theft becomes heritage if you just hold onto it long enough.
The Theatre of Empty Gestures
But for most of Europe’s great institutions, the performance continues. They’ll return a mask here, a manuscript there. Always with great fanfare. Always with speeches about “new partnerships” and “shared heritage.” They want credit for returning crumbs from the feast they stole. They want to be celebrated for their generosity while maintaining their grip on the loot. It’s rather like expecting applause for returning someone’s wallet while keeping all the cash.
The real tell is in how they frame these returns. They’re never corrections of a crime; they’re always gifts of friendship. They’re not thieves returning stolen goods; they’re patrons of culture facilitating cultural exchange. The very vocabulary reveals the con. You “restitute” something you stole. You “donate” something you own. Guess which word they prefer?
Each ceremony becomes an opportunity to rewrite history. The colonizer becomes the protector. The thief becomes the guardian. The criminal becomes the hero of their own story. And all it takes is a royal visit, some carefully chosen words, and a mask on indefinite loan.
Members Only Universal Heritage
Perhaps the most bitter irony is that these museums position themselves as protectors of culture while actively denying entire peoples access to their own heritage. A Congolese person needs a visa to see Congolese art in Brussels. Often denied. An Egyptian needs to fly to Berlin to commune with Nefertiti. If they can get there. The British Museum contains treasures from nations whose citizens it would rather not admit. The universal museum, it turns out, is members only. Your passport determines your membership.
They’ll stream concerts globally and digitize their collections for anyone with Wi-Fi. But somehow the physical objects must remain in London, Paris, and Berlin. For the benefit of all humanity, of course. That humanity, coincidentally, vacations primarily in European capitals. The rest of the world can make do with pixels. Virtual tours of their own stolen heritage.
It’s a peculiar kind of universalism that requires African art to travel to Europe to become universal. Yet the Mona Lisa never needs to tour Lagos to achieve the same status. The Crown Jewels don’t require a sabbatical in Cairo to serve humanity. Universalism, it seems, is just colonialism with a better vocabulary.
The Impossible Confession
This isn’t really about the objects, though the objects matter. It’s about power. Who gets to write history. Who gets to own it. Every stolen mask still sitting in a European museum is a daily reminder that colonialism isn’t actually over. It just learned to speak in a more polite register. It traded the language of civilizing missions for the language of universal heritage. But the underlying message remains the same: we know better than you what to do with your own culture.
The tragedy is that fixing this wouldn’t even be hard. Change the ownership records. Sign over the deeds. Let African institutions decide what stays on loan and what comes home. Let Asian nations reclaim their temples’ gods. Let Indigenous peoples recover their ancestors’ remains. Stop pretending that paperwork from the age of empires is sacred scripture. It’s not complicated. It’s just uncomfortable. It requires admitting that your great museums are great because of a great crime.
But perhaps we’re missing the real fairy tale here. The one Europe tells itself in private, in the quiet moments between ceremonies. It goes something like this:
Be grateful it’s only about some artifacts. Others were completely erased from existence. The Tasmanians are gone. The Herero barely survived. Aboriginal Australians still struggle for recognition on their own land. Entire languages vanished across Latin America. Civilizations turned to footnotes. So really, you’re lucky. Lucky we only took your masks and bronzes. Lucky you’re still here to ask for them back. Lucky you still speak Lingala and those other languages we deemed primitive. We could have finished the job. We chose not to. Never forget that.
This is the unspoken threat behind every “generous” return, every indefinite loan, every ceremony. Not “we’re sorry.” But “you’re welcome.” Welcome for what we didn’t destroy. Grateful for what we chose to leave. It’s the imperial logic that turns survival into a gift from the colonizer rather than a testament to the colonized’s resistance.
Until then, every museum gallery remains a crime scene. Every display case a cell. Every ceremonial return a reminder that in this particular fairy tale, the dragon is still hoarding the gold. He’s just learned to call it preservation.
If this story interested you, you might enjoy our podcast “The Other Africa: Reclaiming the Story,” where we explore African heritage, culture, and history from perspectives you don’t often hear. Each episode uncovers stories of resilience, creativity, and cultural wealth that go far beyond what sits in museum cases. (AI voices for now, human stories throughout.)
Comments